Saturday, August 31, 2013

Taxonomy Development and Knowledge Audit workshops with Patrick Lambe

Taxonomy Development and Knowledge Audit workshops with Patrick Lambe


Thursday, 17 October 2013 at 8:30 AM - Tuesday, 22 October 2013 at 4:00 PM (EST)Barton, ACTThe Brassey of Canberra Macquarie Street BartonACT 2600
ACTKM is proud to bring Patrick Lambe to Canberra to present 2 outstanding workshops.  Numbers are capped at 20 to ensure optimal benefit to the particiapnts. Building taxonomies and conducting knowledge audits are two of the most important - and difficult - activities that a knowledge management (KM) team may be responsible for. From one of the most experienced KM consulting teams in the world, we bring two workshops to share step by step methodologies and a set of tools for both activities - based on over a decade of practice and solid research.


Using interactive techniques and practical exercises, you will learn how to plan and conduct taxonomy and knowledge audit initiatives. We use case examples to illustrate the methodologies taught, and you will have an opportunity - both during and after the workshops - to think about how to apply them to your own organisation.
Each workshop stands alone, but you can also take them together, at a discounted package price. For example, one of the most reliable ways to collect evidence for a corporate taxonomy is to conduct a knowledge audit.  
Taxonomy development workshop 17 - 18 October 2013
Taxonomies are powerful instruments for breaking down siloes and fostering collaboration and learning - not just for information accessibility and navigation. This unique two day programme is focused on helping participants to develop and implement a taxonomy to support the knowledge management objectives and programmes in their organisation. It exposes participants to the range of different ways that taxonomies can be used to support organisation effectiveness, and imparts key design principles for a usable, maintainable and effective taxonomy. We teach an approach to taxonomy development that takes into account different stakeholder needs to ensure maximum adoption and it stresses the importance of a taxonomy as a living system with an active governance and evaluation process around it.
The workshop approach combines presentation of frameworks and proven methods with interactive exercises and opportunities to relate the content back to participants' own organisations. A secure online blog is available for up to three months after the workshop to share queries and follow up questions. Our goal is to equip you with the knowledge and skills to develop and deploy taxonomies effectively in your organisation.
 Knowledge audit workshop 21 - 22 October 2013
Performing a knowledge audit is probably the most important foundational piece of work you can do in Knowledge Management. It forms the basis for identifying what knowledge assets exist and where they are, identifies knowledge flows, knowledge gaps, and improvement opportunities to support the business. This one and a half day workshop is based on ten years of knowledge audit practice around the world, and gives a robust methodology and toolset to help knowledge and information management practitioners focus on practical interventions that will get buy-in and support across the organisation.
The workshop approach introduces the methodology through practical exercises with feedback and analysis, and is accompanied by a set of diagnostic tools. A secure online blog is available for up to three months after the workshop to share queries and follow up questions. Our goal is to equip you with the knowledge and skills to conduct a knowledge audit in your organisation, and work with the results to design helpful interventions.

Friday, August 9, 2013

Copyright: Progress in Australian Law Reform Commission’s inquiry



Background
The ALRC was asked by the Government to consider whether exceptions and statutory licences in the Copyright Act 1968 are adequate and appropriate in the digital environment and whether further exceptions should be recommended on 29 June 2012. The Commission-in-charge is Professor Jill McKeough, who has been seconded from her position as Dean of Law at the University of Technology, Sydney.

The issue of the principles of the nation’s approach to copyright (fair use vs fair dealing) and exceptions and statutory licence provisions are very significant to Australian libraries and organisations.

Changes in technology, education and the economy provide an important context for the report. The ALRC notes that “Policy makers around the world are actively reconsidering the relationship between copyright exceptions and innovation, research, and economic growth, with a view to ensuring that their economies are capable of fully utilising digital technology to remain competitive in a global market”.

The discussion paper released on 31 May is the second discussion paper issued as part of the inquiry. It frames in detail the issues that are expected to appear in the final report which is due to be released by 30 November 2013.

ALIA, ALCC, ADA and many other organisations, provided comments on the first discussion paper and have prepared submissions to this discussion paper. Very broadly they welcome the report as a means of obtaining a copyright regime which better balances the needs of creators and users. If the proposals become recommendations and are accepted one major result would be a change from a concept of “fair dealing” to the “fair use” concept embodied in US legislation and that of many other countries.  There are a number of organisations which do not support this change.

Discussion paper: summary

The ALRC discussion paper is very detailed and comprehensive, containing over 380 pages It is available online http://www.alrc.gov.au/sites/default/files/pdfs/publications/dp79_whole_pdf_.pdf. 46 proposals and 8 questions have been developed in the paper from the detailed analysis undertaken for the inquiry.

A framework for considering copyright is developed by the inquiry based on the following principles:
Principle 1: Acknowledging and respecting authorship and creation
Principle 2: Maintaining incentives for creation of works and other subject matter
Principle 3: Promoting fair access to and wide dissemination of content
Principle 4: Providing rules that are flexible and adaptive to new technologies
Principle 5: Providing rules consistent with Australia’s international obligations

Some key issues are summarised below.

Fair use
In taking consideration the submissions, the fundamental basis for use of material in copyright has been analysed, not for the first time by a copyright review in Australia. Universities Australia argued:

The shortcomings of a purpose-based fair dealing regime are such that reform efforts should be directed to replacing this regime with a more flexible regime rather than tweaking or simplifying the existing fair dealing exceptions. While there may be a continuing role for some specific exceptions, these should operate as prescribed minimum standards that may be exceeded if the use in question satisfies a fairness test. As a general rule, purpose-based exceptions are unlikely to be sufficiently future-proofed to be appropriate in a rapidly developing technological environment. (Universities Australia, 2012 p. 2)

In considering “fair use” the inquiry notes that

There were four main arguments advanced in support of fair use in submissions,
that it:
• provides flexibility to respond to changing conditions as it is principles-based and technology neutral;
• assists innovation;
• restores balance to the copyright system; and
• assists with meeting consumer expectations. (ALRC, 2013, p. 59)

Bodies arguing against fair use put the position that:

• is unnecessary and no case is made out for it;
• would create uncertainty and expense;
• originated in a different legal environment; and
• may not comply with the three-step test. (ALRC, 2013, p. 59)

The ALRCs view in summary is that enactment of a fair use exception in Australia:
• is suitable for the digital economy and will assist innovation;
• provides a flexible standard;
• is coherent and predictable;
• is suitable for the Australian environment; and
• is consistent with the three-step test. (ALRC, 2013, p. 79)

A number of organisations appears to have commenced publically opposing this approach – see  http://www.copyright.com.au/news-items/2013/copyright-news/alrc-discussion-paper-released and https://asauthors.org/bulletin-june-2013 :

Statutory licences
Statutory licences are part of the current Copyright Act. They are compulsory licences that require payment  for certain types of use. The ALRC notes that rights holders cannot choose not to license their material.  The discussion paper proposes the repeal of the statutory licences for educational and other institutions and the statutory licence for the Crown. They argue that “the digital environment appears to call for a new way for these licences to be negotiated and settled. Like most other licences for use of copyright material in Australia and abroad, these licences should be negotiated voluntarily. Voluntary licences—whether direct or collective—are less prescriptive, more efficient and better suited to a digital age.” (ALRC, 2013, p 109).

Universities Australia argued that the licence approach:

·         impedes new technologies and educational uses
·         does not reflect modern teaching methods
·         removes incentives for rights holders to develop innovative and competitive licensing models for educational content
·         has created a false market: Australian universities are paying to copy works that no one ever wanted or expected to be paid for
·         has removed any scope for fair dealing and has led to an unintended shift in the copyright balance
·         is economically inefficient. 

Dr Matthew Rimmer from ANU gave very convincing arguments as to how the scheme disadvantaged those with disabilities.

Again those receiving payments from this scheme are expected to conduct a very strong campaign opposing the proposed change.

Moving to a non statutory licence approach would be more equitable. It will enable Creative Commons and other licencing approaches to be fully realised and will better support teaching and research in universities.


Libraries, archives and digitisation

Chapter 11 addresses the issue of digitisation, in particular section 200AB copying. Only a small number of libraries have been able to use this provision and the ALRC finds that it is “not working”. A more flexible approach is proposed using fair use. The sections on mass digitisation and preservation copying provide a useful summary of international experiences.

The section on “Document supply for research and study” is one that has been identified by ALCC, ADA and ALIA as not well reflecting the Australian environment and needs. Submissions to the discussion paper will address in detail the questions posed in this section.


Summary
The discussion paper’s draft proposals and approach seems to strikes a very fair balance between the interests of creators and users of copyright.

Watch this space – ALIA has produced a submission to the discussion paper which can be found from http://www.alia.org.au/information-and-resources/copyright . The comments focus particularly of inter library lending/document supply and copying for members of parliament.

The major next step will be the issuing of the ALRC report by 30 November 2013.


References
Australian Law Reform Commission (2013) Copyright and the Digital Economy. DISCUSSION PAPER. Sydney: ALRC. http://www.alrc.gov.au/sites/default/files/pdfs/publications/dp79_whole_pdf_.pdf
Universities Australia (2012) Response to the ALRC Issues Paper: Copyright and the Digital Economy November 2012. Canberra: Universities Australia. http://www.universitiesaustralia.edu.au/resources/777/1509


Roxanne Missingham
University Librarian (Chief Scholarly Information Services)
The Australian National University



Monday, July 15, 2013

Winter Dinner July 2013

The Winter dinner was held on  4 July 2013 at the Scholar Restaurant in Dickson. For a winter night we had a good turnout of 25. This dinner gathers librarians across all industry sectors and ALIA groups in the ACT region and judging by the buzz of chatter, all enjoyed catching up with colleagues and friends. For many of us it is the only opportunity to see others from beyond our usual field of work. The food was  delicious too.  


Three awards were presented on the night.

The ACTive  ALIA award for sustained contribution was presented to Gaik Khong for her many years of dedicated volunteering for ALIA and the library profession. Gaik is a quiet achiever who has contributed to ALIA both locally and nationally. Gaik has been the ACTive ALIA treasurer for over five years and has drafted budgets to ALIA headquarters on time with excellent documentation. Gaik has also been involved in organising events and seminars for our local group. 

Gaik was a member of the ALIA Special Libraries Advisory Committee which worked successfully  to improve the visibility of special libraries within the broader ALIA community.  This committee collaborated with the Australian Government Library and Information Network (AGLIN) in a joint exercise to provide a Special Libraries stream for the ALIA 2010 Conference in Brisbane. Gaik played an important role in the planning, implementation and management of this stream program for the conference.  She has also been involved in arranging a variety of joint AGLIN/ALIA seminars in Canberra for librarians and others across all sectors. Gaik was awarded a certificate and a book. 



Catherine Jordan, librarian at the Australian Botanic Gardens, was voted most popular librarian of the ACT as part of the National Year of Reading 2012. Catherine was nominated over ten times, with all of her nominators discussing her extensive knowledge of her specialist library collection and the amazing service she provides for everyone who enters her library. Catherine was presented with a book to mark this achievement. Her winning poll does much to bring the work of dedicated librarians to the notice of the public and colleagues.



Karna O’Dea was presented with a Silver Pin for five years’ service to ALIA committees.  Karna has been an outstanding contributor to ALIA over many years, the ACT Group Convenor for more than five years and she has worked tirelessly and enthusiastically to ensure a range of programs are offered to meet the needs of members.  Karna is a passionate advocate for the profession, sharing information and ideas.  She was a major force behind the Value of Libraries symposium in 2012 as well as library visits, meetings and publicity.  She manages the ALIA ACTive blog, taking us into social media with gusto.
All who attended enjoyed the  fellowship and conviviality of the evening.  We thank Roxanne Missingham and Vanessa Little for presenting the awards, and the National Library for donating the books presented:  A steady hand; Governor Hunter and his First Fleet sketchbook, by Linda Groom (National Library of Australia 2012), and Collecting ladies; Ferdinand von Mueller and women botanical artists, by Penny Olsen (NLA Publishing, 2013). 

Our next social event will be an end of the year gathering at the new Arboretum.

Silver Pin presentation:
Award winners, Catherine, Karna and Gaik,  standing and at right:

Wednesday, July 10, 2013

Libraries and Ebooks Summary

On the 3 July 2013, 45 librarians from the Canberra region met at Gungahlin Library to discuss the current limitations around ebooks. The two presenters were Margarita Moreno (NLA) and Vanessa Little (Libraries ACT), who also led the discussions.  
The session began with Vanessa speaking passionately about how libraries are at a crossroads in regards to epublications.  Vanessa stated that we need to fight publishers to provide our customers with the access and flexibility they expect as well as being able to receive any epublication we feel belongs in our library’s collections.   Vanessa went into more detail with “Setting the scene: the E-book landscape” - a presentation from Margaret Allen.  (http://www.alia.org.au/sites/default/files/documents/advocacy/Margaret%20Allen%20ALIA%20ebooks%20think%20tank%2028%20May%202013.pdf).  Afterwards everyone briefly introduced themselves and broke into smaller groups to discuss their ebook experiences and issues that arose in their libraries (http://www.scribd.com/doc/152860054/Collated-notes-from-Libraries-and-Ebooks-03-07-2013-docx - pages 1-3).
The second presentation, from Margarita, looked at Inter Library Loans (ILL), Document Delivery (DD) and ebooks (http://www.scribd.com/doc/152860419/E-books-and-ILL-July-2013-ppt).  This was followed by a second discussion session where the focus was on ALIA’s draft principles (http://www.alia.org.au/sites/default/files/documents/advocacy/ALIAebooksandelendingposition130522.pdf 
and collated notes at http://www.scribd.com/doc/152860054/Collated-notes-from-Libraries-and-Ebooks-03-07-2013-docx - pages 4-5).
In between the two presentations attendees had the opportunity to see behind the scenes at Gungahlin Library and visit the Digital Hub.
Thank you once again to Vanessa Little for leading the discussion and Margarita Moreno for her presentation on the ILL and DD perspective.
Also a big thank you to all the Libraries ACT staff who helped make this afternoon possible – Sharon, Adrian, Shruti, Billie, Halina, Matthew and Debbie.


Additional resources:
http://www.ala.org/transforminglibraries/a4le

http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2012/may/14/pay-us-for-library-ebook-loans

http://lj.libraryjournal.com/2013/05/technology/ebooks/overdrive-and-sourcebooks-to-launch-ambitious-ebook-data-experiment/

http://lj.libraryjournal.com/2012/10/opinion/random-house-says-libraries-own-their-ebooks-lj-insider/

http://www.infodocket.com/2012/12/20/ebooks-e-approval-plans-in-research-libraries-preprint/

http://ebookadvocacy.wordpress.com/

Tuesday, June 18, 2013

Libraries and Ebooks seminar Wednesday, July 3, 2013 1:30 PM to 4:30 PM (Gungahlin, ACT

Wednesday, June 12, 2013

Impressions of the tour of the National Computational Infrastructure 31 May 2013

Tour of the  National Computational Infrastructure

On the last day of Information Awareness month (31 May), a number of us (both librarians and IT professionals)  toured the  National Computational Infrastructure (NCI) centre  on the Australian National University Campus. It was a fitting finale to the end of this  month that had successfully promoted an increased awareness of  information management amongst both practioneers and  the wider community.


Professor Lindsay Botten kindly gave up his  Friday afternoon to give us a very informative tour of the ‘super-computer’ that crunches massive data (140 petaflops at peak performance) on  topics such as climate change and medical research. Partners drawn from  the university and government sector work together with massive data assets to visualise and model data in areas of real significance to Australia (and beyond: national water management and earth system science being another two areas. At the moment, Professor Botten advised the major contribution that research from NCI is making towards analysing the patterns of the Earth’s energy distribution in the Southern ocean. Combining this research with other analysis being undertaken in the area of climate-science, the research work and analysis will make a significant contribution to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report on Climate Change due later this year.


The architecture of the building looks very 21st century – part of this because it encompasses several elements of modern super-computing. Personally I found it very exciting to actually learn how the entire closed system works. Massive cooling mechanisms are in place as the super computer generates great heat. We could feel the heat of the systems walking through the centre of the installation. The cooling plant reminded me of the pictures of the  Snowy Mountain hydroelectric stations – it was on a larger scale than you would think! I drew the analogy of the Star Trek movie centred around the spaceship of the aliens ‘the Borg’ when we entered the computer itself: I felt I had become part of ‘the colony’. Several others were thinking of Skynet in the Terminator series. While you may have one or two processor cores in your computer at home or work, the NCI has 57,500! A few gigabytes of memory may allow your computer to do enough processing – the NCI has 160 terabytes – and 10 petabytes of disk. As well as the storage, a lot of data is cycled onto tape and backed up as well, allowing the computer to focus on current tasks. While these figures sound like it will be able to cope forever, the pace of change is a major challenge – the computer will need substantial updating in three or four years to meet the rapid pace of change we are in the midst of! It was fascinating to see how far the technology has progressed and was a real privilege to have a look at such a facility in Canberra.

There was no doubt in the minds of anyone who participated that concepts being bandied about in the press (such as “Big Data”) are already upon us – in an almost mind-blowing way. And the NCI is an example of partnerships coming together to help Australia stay at the forefront and make a big contribution in high-impact research. Thanks to Professor Botten for  giving us the guided tour.

Here is some background for the perplexed amongst us:

The National Computational Infrastructure, Australia’s national high-end computing service, is an initiative of the Australian Government, hosted by the Australian National University. NCI’s mission, to foster ambitious and aspirational research objectives, and to enable their realisation through world-class high-end computing services. The cutting-edge infrastructure and internationally renowned expert support allow this, the only supercomputer of Australia, to be an integral part of world-best research. Professor Brian Schmidt (Winner of the Nobel Prize for Physics 2011) is undertaking a mapping project that could change understanding of astronomy in the near-future!

NCI’s advanced computing infrastructure, comprising a petascale HPC system, a large-scale compute cloud (primarily for data-intensive services), and multi-petabyte high-performance storage, is funded through programs of the Department of Industry, Innovation, Climate Change, Science, Research and Tertiary Education, while its operations are sustained through the substantial co-investment by a number of partner organisations including ANU, CSIRO, the Australian Bureau of Meteorology, Geoscience Australia, a number of Australia’s research-intensive universities, and the Australian Research Council.

If you’re interested in the NCI and what they are up to, be sure to look at their website http://nci.org.au/ for more background and information.

Karna O'Dea and Sean Wright



Thursday, June 6, 2013

active ALIA Winter dinner is on 4 July 2013

The active ALIA Winter dinner  is on 4 July 2013 at the Scholar restaurant in  Woolley Street Dickson at 7.30pm. It Is usually a very convivial night.

We are presenting the  two achievement awards, which recognise contribution to the local ACT ALIA groups and the library profession.
The ACTive ALIA Awards recognise and promote the work of members of the association. The awards are open to personal financial members of ALIA.
Two awards are available:
·                  Outstanding Contribution Award
·                  Initiative Award


We are also hoping that Catherine Jordan ( Australian National Botanic Gardens) the local favourite librarian of the Act will be present to accept the admiration of her ACT colleagues